The world’s premier auctions
Be the first to know about
the latest online auctions.
Please enter a valid email address (
Sign Up »
PS: We value your privacy
Thank you!
Want to learn more
about online auctions?
Take a Quick Tour »
is now
To celebrate, we’ve enhanced our site with
larger images and browsing by category to help
you easily find what you’re passionate about.
Remember to update your bookmarks.
Get Started »
Invaluable cannot guarantee the accuracy of translations through Google Translate and disclaims any responsibility for inaccurate translations.
Show translation options

Lot 4: John Roddam Spencer Stanhope (1829-1908)


by Christie's

November 28, 2001

London, United Kingdom

John Roddam Spencer Stanhope (1829-1908) Please Register/Login to access your Invaluable Alerts

Looking for the realized and estimated price?

Description: Knowledge strangling Ignorance signed and inscribed 'Knowledge Strangling/-Ignorance-by/R. Spencer Stanhope/-Florence-' (on the artist's label attached to the backboard) pencil, watercolour and bodycolour with gum arabic, heightened with gold 19 7/8 x 133/4 in. (50.5 x 35 cm.) PROVENANCE Probably Mrs Mure by 1909. Mrs A.M.W. Stirling. EXHIBITION London, Royal Academy, 1902, no. 919. Probably Birmingham, Royal Birmingham Society of Artists, Special Collection of Works by the late R. Spencer Stanhope, Autumn exhibition, 1909, no. 55, lent by Mrs Mure. NOTES Stanhope exhibited two pictures with this title, presumably versions of the same composition. One appeared at the New Gallery in 1890 (no. 81), the other at the Royal Academy in 1902, together with The Vision of Ezekiel (lot 9). Our picture, a watercolour, is almost certainly the 1902 version, while the one shown twelve years earlier at the New Gallery was probably a larger oil. The present picture is undated, and the New Gallery version seems to be missing; nor were the measurements for either version given in the respective catalogues. However, the 1902 picture must have been a watercolour since it was shown in the RA's Water Colour Room, while the 1890 version appeared in the New Gallery's West Gallery, a room which contained many paintings by other artists which were undoubtedly large oils. Our picture's style supports this conclusion. It has a number of features in common with The Vision of Ezekiel, its companion at the 1902 RA, notably the very linear and angular treatment of the drapery and the way in which blue wash is used to lend distance to the background. Yet despite the painter's age (seventy-three), there is no falling off in quality. The forms are realised with care and precision, and the two allegorical figures are well characterised. Nor is there any diminution of the sense of colour which had so impressed Stanhope's circle at the beginning of his career. The way the red of Knowledge's wings is picked up by the tattered banner and the roofs, and then offset against passages of blue and gold, is a fine chromatic invention. It is the sort of colour harmony that Gustave Moreau often created. We know of no formal link between the two artists, but Moreau was only three years Stanhope's senior, and working very much in the same Symbolist tradition. The moated and turreted castle is a motif that Stanhope had used many years before in Our Lady of the Water Gate, a masterpiece of the late 1860s or early 1870s that appeared in these Rooms in November 1992 (fig. 1). The white sky is also a familiar Stanhopian touch (see lot 3). As for the protagonists - a female figure with flying drapery leaning over a naked man, with unkempt hair, seated on the ground - there is perhaps the faintest echo here of the central group in Botticelli's Calumny of Apelles in the Uffizi (fig. 2). Stanhope would have known this picture well, but any relationship with his watercolour can hardly be more than a matter of unconscious reminiscence. It is argued below that The Vision of Ezekiel may make some reference to Victorian fears on the subject of immortality. If, as this suggests, Stanhope deliberately adopted a symbolist agenda in his old age, then it is tempting to look for some comparable meaning in his allegory of the conflict between ignorance and knowledge. Was he perhaps thinking of the civilising force of the British Empire, as Ignorance's broken fetters might indicate? Or were his thoughts nearer home as he made a mute protest at the crass stupidity of Florence's tourists? We know that he hated change and so-called progress. In 1889 he exhibeted at the New Gallery a picture entitled In Memorium. The Old City Walls by the Jews' Burial Ground, Florence, now in course of removal.

Bid Now on Items for Sale

(view more)
View more items for sale »